国际政治科学

参考文献

①参见Charles W.Kegley,ed.,Controversies in International Relations Theory:Realism and Neo-liberal Challenge(New York St.Martin's,1995),pp.9—14.

①E.H.Cars,Tuenty Yeurs' Crisis:1919—1939(New York:Harper and Row,1964),p.vii.

②Ibid.,p.102.

③Ibid.,p.60.

①Hans J.Morgenthau,Politics among Nations:The Struggle for Power and Peace,3rd.ed.(New York:Alfred A Knopf,1961),pp.4—15.

①摩根索强调外交是实现国际和平的重要工具。他认为，在当今的世界中，国际社会并不存在要想建立国际社会，并使之存在下去，就必须使用外交这一协调工具。Hans J．Morgenthau，Politics among Nations,p.568.

②Kenneth W.Thompson.Master of International Thought(Baton Rouge:Louisiana University Press,1980),p.88.

①Kenneth Waltz，Theory of International Politics(Reading，Mass．：Addison-Wesley，1979)。该书至今仍是国际政治学引用率最高的著作。

①参见Robert O．Keohane，ed．，Neorelaism and Its Critics(New York：Columbia University Press，1986)。其中新现实主义一词都是指沃尔兹的结构现实主义

②参见Robert Cox,Production,Power,and World Order(New York:Columbia University Press,1987);Richard Ashley,“The Poverty of Neorealism,”International Organization,Vol.38,No.2.1984,pp.225—286.

③见肯尼思·沃尔兹：《国际政治理论》2001年中文版封底。

①“利维坦”原为《圣经·以赛亚书》中的海洋巨兽，后指拥有巨大权力的国家机器。参见Thomas Hobbes,Levithan,Michael Oakeshott ed.(New York and London:Macmillan,1974),chap.13.

②参见Harry K.Dans and Robert C.Good,eds.,Reinhold Niebuhr on Politics(New York:Scribner's,1960),pp.78—78.

①Waltz,Theory of International Politics,pp.79—128.

②Morgenthau,Politics among Nations,pp.38—43.

①K.J.Holsti,International Politics:A Framework for Analysis(Englewood Cliffs,NJ.:Prentice Hall,1992),pp.9—10.

①James Mayall,Nationalism and International Society(Cambridge,England:Cambridge University Press,1990),引自Herbert M.Levine,ed.,World Politics Debated(New York:MaGraw-Hill,1993),p.28.

②Stephen Krasner,Defending National Interest(Princeton,NJ.:Princeton University Press,1978),pp.42—45.

③Bruce Bueno de Mesquita,The War Trap(New York:Yale University Press,1981),p.20.

①Graham Allison,“Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis,”American Political Science Review,Vol.69,No.2,1969,p.694.

②Herbert Simon,“Human Nature in Politics,”American Political Science Review,Vol.79,No.2,1985,p.294.

①Kenneth Waltz,Man,the State,and War(New York :Columbia University Press,1959).

②David Singer,“The Level-of-Analysis Problem in Internatinnal Relations,”World Politics,Vol.14,No.1,1961,pp.77—92.

③Kenneth Waltz,“Realist Thought and Neo-realist Theory,”Journal of International Affairs,Vol.44,No.1,1990,p.33.

④Waltz,Theory of International Politics,chap.2 and 3.

①Morton Kaplan,System and Process in International Politics(New York:Wiley,1964)

②Morgenthau,Politics among Nations,pp.167—220.

③Singer,“The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations.”

④Waltz,Theory of International Politics,chap.3,4.and 5.

⑤Waltz,Theory of International Politics,chap.4.

①Waltz,Theory of International Politics,pp.99—101.

②A.F.K.Organski and Jacek Kugler,The Wat Ledger(Chicago:The University of Chicago Press 1980).

①参见Waltz,Theory of International Politics;John Mearsheimer,“Back to the Future:Instability in Europe after the Cold War,”International Security,Vol.15,No.1,1990,转引自Foreign Affairs Agenda,New Shape of World Politics:Contending Paradigms in International Relations(New York:W.W.Norton,1999),pp.101—157.

②沃尔兹的理论甚至可以用一个简单的函数公式表示，即B=f(S)。其中，B为国家行为，S为国际体系结构。

①参见Robert W.Cox,“Social Forces,States,and World Order,”in Robert Keohane,ed.,Neorealism and Its Critics,pp.204—254;Richard K.Ashley,“The Poverty of Realism,”in Robert Keohane,ed.,Neorealism and Its Critics,pp.255—300.

②Cox,“Social Forces,States,and World Order,”p.208.

①王缉思：《遏制还是交往》，《国际问题研究》1996年第1期，第5页。

②Joseph Nye,“Neorealism and Neoliberalism,”World Politics,Vol.40,No.2,1988,pp.235—251.

①Alexander Wendt,“Anarchy ls What States Make of It:The Social Construction of Power Politics,”International Organization,Vol.46,No.2,1992,pp.391—425.

①最小现实主义(minimal realism)是采用了Legro和Moravesik的术语。参见Jeffrey W．Legro and Andrew Moravcsik，“Is Anybody Still a Realist?”International Security，Vol．24，No．2，1999，pp．19，27。他们将所有偏离现实主义基本假定的中观现实主义理论一概称为“最小现实主义”，包含了所谓的新古典现实主义等流派。最大现实主义则是我根据Legro和Moravcsik的术语提出的。

②Mearsheimer,“Back to the Future:Instability in Europe after the Cold War.”

③John J.Mearsheimer,The Tragedy of Great Power Politics(New York and Longdon:W.W.Norton 2001),p.5.

①John J.Mearsheimer,The Tragedy of Great Power Politics,p.12.

②Ibid.,p.21.

③Hans J.Morgenthau,Politics Among Nations,Part Ten.

④对于最小现实主义的论述主要参考了Legro和Moravcsik的文章“Is Anyone StiB a Realist?”

⑤Joseph Gfieco,“State Interests and Institutional Rule Trajectories:Neorealist Interpretation of the Maastrict Treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union,”in Benjamin Frankel,ed.,Realism:Restatements and Renewal(London:Frank Cass,1996),p.304;Charles Glaser,“Realists as Optimists:Cooperation as Self-help,”in Michael Brown,Scan Lynn-Jones,and Steven E.Miller,eds.,The Perils of Anarchy:Contemporary Realism and International Security(Cambridge,M A.:MIT Press,1995),pp.408—417.以上转引自詹姆斯·多尔蒂和小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫：《争论中的国际关系理论》(阎学通、陈寒溪等译)，北京，世界知识出版社2003年版，第98—99页。

①Legro and Maravcsik,“Is Anyone Still a Realist?”pp.41—42.

②多尔蒂和普法尔茨格拉夫：《争论中的国际关系理论》，第95页。

③John Ikenbury,David Lake,and Michael Mastanduno,eds.,The State and American Foreign Economic Policy(Itacha:Cornell University Press,1988).

①Robert Putman,“Diplomacy and Domestic Politics:The Logic of Two-level Games,”International Organization,Vol.42,No.3,1988,pp.427—60.

②Legro and Moravcsik,“Is Anyone Still a Realist?”pp.24,28.

③Stephen Wait,“Revolution and War,”World Politics,Vol.44,No.3,1992,p.321.转引自多尔蒂和普法尔茨格拉夫：《争论中的国际关系理论》，第295—296页。

④参见罗伯特·杰维斯：《国际政治中的知觉与错误知觉》(秦亚青译)，北京，世界知识出版社2002年版。

①Legro和Moravicsik认为，沃尔特的理论放松了现实主义关于物质性权力的假定，“事实上，‘威胁均衡’理论不仅牺牲了新现实主义的内在统一性和独特性，也牺牲了更加广义的现实主义理论”。参见Legro and Moravcsik,“Is Anyone Still a Realist?”pp.36—37。